🇺🇸
Constitutional Law • Takings
CONLAW#069
Legal Definition
Property is taken for public use so long as the government acts out of a reasonable belief the taking will benefit the public. This is defined very broadly.
Plain English Explanation
A court won't question the government's judgment about public use unless it has no rational connection to a legitimate goal.
For example, let's say a city wants to redevelop its downtown area to help the struggling local economy. The city buys up land from owners voluntarily selling. But Bob refuses to sell his land in the area. The city takes Bob's land through eminent domain. Bob argues this isn't for "public use" because his land will be given to a private developer to build a new mall. However, the court will likely accept the city's determination that taking Bob's land is reasonably related to the legitimate goal of economic growth through redevelopment. So even though a private developer will operate the new mall, the city's actions to take Bob's land will likely be considered a valid "public use."
The key point is the court does not scrutinize the specifics of the government's decision or whether other options might achieve the same public benefit. As long as the city reasonably connects the taking to goals like jobs, taxes, redeveloping blighted areas, etc., the court defers to the government's public use determination. This gives the government huge leeway to take property by just articulating some public benefit.
For example, let's say a city wants to redevelop its downtown area to help the struggling local economy. The city buys up land from owners voluntarily selling. But Bob refuses to sell his land in the area. The city takes Bob's land through eminent domain. Bob argues this isn't for "public use" because his land will be given to a private developer to build a new mall. However, the court will likely accept the city's determination that taking Bob's land is reasonably related to the legitimate goal of economic growth through redevelopment. So even though a private developer will operate the new mall, the city's actions to take Bob's land will likely be considered a valid "public use."
The key point is the court does not scrutinize the specifics of the government's decision or whether other options might achieve the same public benefit. As long as the city reasonably connects the taking to goals like jobs, taxes, redeveloping blighted areas, etc., the court defers to the government's public use determination. This gives the government huge leeway to take property by just articulating some public benefit.
Hypothetical
Hypo 1: The city of Hypofornia wants to address its housing crisis by developing affordable housing. They decide to take Bob's unused land to build this housing, believing it will help with the city's welfare. Result: The taking is for public use because creating affordable housing is related to the legitimate public purpose of promoting social welfare.
Hypo 2: New Hypoland's government allows a private company to build a new power plant on land currently owned by Sam. The plant will provide much-needed energy to thousands of homes. Result: This action is considered a taking for public use because it directly relates to a public benefit—increasing energy supply and promoting economic development.
Hypo 3: Bob's land is taken by the city to construct a new public school. The government argues this will benefit the community by providing better education opportunities. Result: This is a taking for public use as it clearly serves the public's interest in education, welfare, and safety.
Hypo 2: New Hypoland's government allows a private company to build a new power plant on land currently owned by Sam. The plant will provide much-needed energy to thousands of homes. Result: This action is considered a taking for public use because it directly relates to a public benefit—increasing energy supply and promoting economic development.
Hypo 3: Bob's land is taken by the city to construct a new public school. The government argues this will benefit the community by providing better education opportunities. Result: This is a taking for public use as it clearly serves the public's interest in education, welfare, and safety.
Visual Aids
