🇺🇸
Constitutional Law • Voting
CONLAW#081
Legal Definition
Counting uncounted votes without standards to guide the ballot examiners in a presidential election violates Equal Protection.
Plain English Explanation
In every presidential election, every vote matters. But sometimes, not all votes get counted on Election Day. For example, there might be mail-in ballots that arrive late or ballots that the voting machines didn't read correctly. When this happens, officials have to look at those votes and decide if they should be counted.
The rule is like a set of instructions for those officials. It says that if you're going to count these left-out votes, you need to have clear standards. This means there should be specific guidelines or criteria that help officials decide which votes are valid and should be counted. The reason for this rule is pretty straightforward: it's all about fairness and equality. Without clear standards, different places might count votes in different ways. This could make the election results feel unfair, as if some votes matter more than others depending on where you live.
The rule is like a set of instructions for those officials. It says that if you're going to count these left-out votes, you need to have clear standards. This means there should be specific guidelines or criteria that help officials decide which votes are valid and should be counted. The reason for this rule is pretty straightforward: it's all about fairness and equality. Without clear standards, different places might count votes in different ways. This could make the election results feel unfair, as if some votes matter more than others depending on where you live.
Hypothetical
Hypo 1: In the presidential election, Hypofornia and New Hypoland both have leftover mail-in ballots. Hypofornia has a clear rule that says any mail-in ballot received up to three days after Election Day will be counted if postmarked by Election Day. New Hypoland has no such rule, and ballot examiners decide on a case-by-case basis. Result: Hypofornia's approach follows the rule because it has clear standards. New Hypoland's approach violates the rule because it lacks clear standards, leading to potential unequal treatment of voters.
