🤔
Contracts • Defenses to Enforcement and Formation
K#069
Legal Definition
If one party induces another party to enter into a contract by making a known false assertion of fact, then the contract is voidable by the innocent party if they justifiably relied on the fraudulent misrepresentation. If the misrepresentation was not fraudulent, then the contract is still voidable by the innocent party if they justifiably relied on a material misrepresentation.
Plain English Explanation
Contracts are sacred. The law expects all parties to make good faith efforts not to be jerks or shady. People are generally free to not make any representations about services and products, which would force potential customers to do their own research and come to their own conclusions. That would be pretty difficult, though, since representations and claims are the basis of marketing. For example, if both Bob and Sam sell hamburgers, Bob may be able to sell more hamburgers if he advertises them as "100% Grass Fed Beef," especially if Sam is only selling his as "Hamburger."
When a party makes a representation and knowingly lies about it, then the contract can be voided/cancelled by the innocent party if they reasonably relied on the claim. Any type of lie that is used to induce someone into a contract is sufficient to allow them to void the agreement if they can show they relied on that information to be true. In contrast, if a party makes a representation that is false but they didn't realize it was false, the innocent party may only void the agreement if they can show that they relied on the information to be true and that it is an important aspect of the agreement (i.e., a material misrepresentation).
When a party makes a representation and knowingly lies about it, then the contract can be voided/cancelled by the innocent party if they reasonably relied on the claim. Any type of lie that is used to induce someone into a contract is sufficient to allow them to void the agreement if they can show they relied on that information to be true. In contrast, if a party makes a representation that is false but they didn't realize it was false, the innocent party may only void the agreement if they can show that they relied on the information to be true and that it is an important aspect of the agreement (i.e., a material misrepresentation).
Hypothetical
Hypo 1: Bob is selling a framed painting. Sam is interested in the painting. Bob tells Sam, "This was painted by Picasso and is framed in a pine wood frame." Bob knows that the painting was not actually painted by Picasso, but he is not aware that the frame is actually made out of oak, not pine. Sam agrees to buy the painting and later finds out the truth about the painter and the wood. Result: Bob lying about the painting being by Picasso is sufficient to allow Sam to void the contract to purchase it. However, Bob being incorrect about the type of cheap wood the frame is made out of is unlikely sufficient to void the contract unless there are additional facts that make it clear the type of wood was important to Sam. If the wood type was important, then it would be a "material misrepresentation," and then would be sufficient to void the contract.
Visual Aids
Related Concepts
What are the 12 defenses to enforcement and formation?
What are the 4 methods of satisfying the Statute of Frauds?
What are the requirements for a judicial admission to satisfy the Statute of Frauds?
What are the requirements for performance to satisfy the Statute of Frauds in a sale of ordinary goods?
What are the requirements for performance to satisfy the Statute of Frauds in a sale of specially manufactured goods?
What are the requirements for performance to satisfy the Statute of Frauds in a service contract?
What are the requirements for performance to satisfy the Statute of Frauds in a transfer of real estate?
What constitutes a service contract not capable of performance within a year?
What constitutes a valid transfer of interest in real estate?
What constitutes lack of capacity?
What is a merchant's confirmatory memo?
What is a person without capacity legally obligated to pay for?
What is a suretyship contract?
What is the effect of ambiguous words in an agreement?
What is the effect of a mutual mistake of fact on the formation of a contract?
What is the effect of a unilateral mistake of fact on the formation of a contract?
What is the effect of duress on the formation of a contract?
What is the effect of non-disclosure on the formation of a contract?
"What is the effect of provisions in contracts requiring written modifications?"
What is the effect on an agreement if its purpose is illegal?
What is the effect on an agreement if its subject matter or consideration being illegal?
What is the result of a covenant not to compete that lacks reasonable need or time and place limits?
What is the result of an exculpatory agreement that exempts intentional or reckless conduct from liability?
What is the Statute of Frauds?
What is unconscionability and its effect on the formation of a contract?
What is undue influence and its effect on the formation of a contract?
What rights does a contracting minor have upon reaching the age of majority?
What types of contracts fall within the Statute of Frauds?