👀
Torts • Negligence
TORT#036
Legal Definition
Landowners owe no duty to protect someone off premises from natural conditions on the premises, but are liable to a passerby for unreasonably dangerous artificial conditions or structures abutting adjacent lands.
Plain English Explanation
Landowners generally don't need to concern themselves with the health or safety of people who are not physically on their land. There are a couple circumstances where they do: First, where the harm is caused from an unnatural condition on the land. For example, imagine a person who built a large parabolic mirror on their property that caused a focused beam of sunlight to project out into the street, blinding motorists and causing accidents.
Second, landowners owe some duty of care to a passersby (like people walking on the sidewalk next to the land) for either super dangerous, unnatural conditions, or structures that are on the property line. For example, if you dug a deep pit on the edge of your property next to a sidewalk, you would need to make sure people don't accidentally fall into it. Perhaps you build a railing or fence on the property line between your land and the sidewalk. Awesome, right? Except, if your barrier ends up tipping over and falling on a passerby, you are, again, liable.
Second, landowners owe some duty of care to a passersby (like people walking on the sidewalk next to the land) for either super dangerous, unnatural conditions, or structures that are on the property line. For example, if you dug a deep pit on the edge of your property next to a sidewalk, you would need to make sure people don't accidentally fall into it. Perhaps you build a railing or fence on the property line between your land and the sidewalk. Awesome, right? Except, if your barrier ends up tipping over and falling on a passerby, you are, again, liable.
Hypothetical
Hypo 1: Sam has a beautiful flower patch in his backyard. Every spring, swarms of bees visit his flowers. One day, one of the bees flies next door to Bob and stings him in the face. Result: Wild bees acting wildly is about as natural as it gets. As such, Sam owes no one outside of his property any duty to protect them from being stung.
Related Concepts
In assessing negligence per se, when is breach excused?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by bailees?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by children?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by common carriers and innkeepers?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by landowners to discovered or anticipated trespassers?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by landowners to invitees?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by landowners to lessees?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by landowners to licensees?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by landowners to undiscovered trespassers?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed by professionals?
In assessing negligence, what duty of care is owed during emergencies?
In assessing negligence, what is actual causation and what three methods may be used to determine it?
In assessing negligence, what is a proximate cause?
In assessing negligence, what is negligence per se?
In assessing negligence, what is the but for test?
In assessing negligence, when does breach occur?
In assessing negligence, when do you determine whether a cause was a substantial factor in causing the injury?
In assessing negligence, when do you determine whether there are alternative causes to the injury, and what is the result?
In assessing negligence, when is a duty of care owed?
In assessing negligence, when is there a duty to act?
In assessing negligence, who owes a duty and what is the general standard of care owed?
In assessing proximate causation, what is the relationship between foreseeability, direct causation, and indirect causation?
What damages are available for negligence actions?
What is an attractive nuisance, and how is a claim established?
What is negligence?
When is a lessor liable for dangerous defects on their property?