🇺🇸
Constitutional Law • Congressional Authority to Act
CONLAW#025
Legal Definition
Section 5 of the 14th Amendment is Congress' power to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment. Congress may not create new rights or expand the scope of existing rights, but can act to prevent or remedy violations of rights recognized by the courts. Congress' means, though, must be congruent and proportional to remedying proven constitutional violations.
Plain English Explanation
The 14th Amendment protects important rights of citizens, like equal protection and due process. Section 5 gives Congress power to enforce these rights and stop states from violating them. For example, if a state passes a law that unfairly discriminates against a group of citizens, Congress can step in and prohibit that discriminatory law.
However, Congress cannot use Section 5 to create brand new rights that courts have not recognized. And Congress cannot expand the scope of existing 14th Amendment rights beyond what courts have defined them to mean. Congress is limited to stopping actual violations of the rights the 14th Amendment covers.
When Congress acts to remedy violations, its actions must be balanced responses that are appropriate to the problem. Congress cannot go too far and create burdensome new laws that really have little to do with the rights violation at issue. There must be a reasonable fit between the wrong being fixed and Congress's solution.
In other words, Section 5 allows Congress to enforce core equal protection and due process rights against state infringement. But Congress cannot stretch 14th Amendment rights beyond their judicial limits or create unreasonable fixes for violations.
However, Congress cannot use Section 5 to create brand new rights that courts have not recognized. And Congress cannot expand the scope of existing 14th Amendment rights beyond what courts have defined them to mean. Congress is limited to stopping actual violations of the rights the 14th Amendment covers.
When Congress acts to remedy violations, its actions must be balanced responses that are appropriate to the problem. Congress cannot go too far and create burdensome new laws that really have little to do with the rights violation at issue. There must be a reasonable fit between the wrong being fixed and Congress's solution.
In other words, Section 5 allows Congress to enforce core equal protection and due process rights against state infringement. But Congress cannot stretch 14th Amendment rights beyond their judicial limits or create unreasonable fixes for violations.
Hypothetical
Hypo 1: In the state of Hypofornia, a law is passed allowing businesses to refuse service to individuals based on their religious beliefs, leading to widespread discrimination against specific religious groups. In response, Congress passes a law prohibiting businesses from refusing service based on religion, aiming to uphold the principles of equality. Result: This is a proper use of Section 5 of the 14th Amendment by Congress. They are acting to prevent violations of the Equal Protection Clause by ensuring no one is discriminated against due to their religion. This corrective action is congruent and proportional to the issue at hand.
Hypo 2: In New Hypoland, a new law significantly restricts the voting rights of minority groups, such as by requiring specific types of identification that these groups are less likely to have. Seeing this as a direct violation of the Equal Protection Clause, Congress passes legislation to protect these groups' voting rights. Result: Here, Congress is using its Section 5 authority appropriately. They're remedying a clear constitutional violation against minority groups by ensuring their equal protection under the law, specifically in the context of voting.
Hypo 3: The state of Hypofornia enacts a law that allows the government to seize property from individuals without proper notice or a hearing. Congress responds by passing a law requiring all states to follow due process before seizing any property. Result: Congress is correctly applying its Section 5 powers to prevent a constitutional violation here. By ensuring due process is respected, Congress is addressing a direct violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Hypo 5: In Hypofornia, a new state law imposes excessive fines for minor traffic violations, disproportionately affecting low-income residents. Congress passes a law setting maximum fines for such violations to address this issue. Result: This action by Congress represents a proper use of its Section 5 powers, as it aims to remedy potential violations of the 14th Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines. Congress is ensuring that penalties are fair and not punitive beyond reason, thus upholding constitutional protections.
Hypo 2: In New Hypoland, a new law significantly restricts the voting rights of minority groups, such as by requiring specific types of identification that these groups are less likely to have. Seeing this as a direct violation of the Equal Protection Clause, Congress passes legislation to protect these groups' voting rights. Result: Here, Congress is using its Section 5 authority appropriately. They're remedying a clear constitutional violation against minority groups by ensuring their equal protection under the law, specifically in the context of voting.
Hypo 3: The state of Hypofornia enacts a law that allows the government to seize property from individuals without proper notice or a hearing. Congress responds by passing a law requiring all states to follow due process before seizing any property. Result: Congress is correctly applying its Section 5 powers to prevent a constitutional violation here. By ensuring due process is respected, Congress is addressing a direct violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Hypo 5: In Hypofornia, a new state law imposes excessive fines for minor traffic violations, disproportionately affecting low-income residents. Congress passes a law setting maximum fines for such violations to address this issue. Result: This action by Congress represents a proper use of its Section 5 powers, as it aims to remedy potential violations of the 14th Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines. Congress is ensuring that penalties are fair and not punitive beyond reason, thus upholding constitutional protections.
Related Concepts
How may Congress use its taxing power?
May Congress prohibit harmful commercial activities?
Under Lopez, when may Congress regulate commerce?
What are the Constitutional limitations on Congress' authority to act?
What are the Constitutional limitations on federal police power?
What is the effect of the 10th Amendment on Congress?
What is the effect of the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine of the 10th Amendment?
What is the impact of the necessary and proper clause?
When may Congress use its spending power?
