Logo

What is the Equal Protection Clause?

Bar Exam Prep Constitutional Law Equal Protection What is the Equal Protection Clause?
🇺🇸 Constitutional Law • Equal Protection CONLAW#104

Legal Definition

The Equal Protection Clause ensures that the government's differential treatment of people is adequately justified.

Plain English Explanation

The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment requires states to treat similarly situated people equally. When laws or government policies single out groups for different treatment, the government needs sufficient justification.

The purpose is to protect against unfair discrimination and arbitrary distinctions made by the state. For example, a law that allowed only men to vote would treat women differently without adequate reason, violating equal protection.

The level of justification required depends on the type of classification and right involved. Discrimination based on race, national origin, or other suspect classes faces the highest bar of strict scrutiny. But most laws are reviewed for mere rationality under the lowest standard of rational basis review.

Overall, the Equal Protection Clause doesn't forbid all differential treatment - it just demands the state have appropriate reasons for the lines it draws. For example, let's say the government decides to give a tax break to families with children but not to single individuals. This rule would step in to ask, "Hey, is there a fair reason for this difference?"

Hypothetical

Hypo 1: Hypofornia passes a law that says only people with blue eyes can use public parks on weekends. Bob, who has brown eyes, is told he can't enter the park on Saturday. Result: Under the Equal Protection Clause, this law would likely be struck down because it unfairly discriminates against people based on eye color, which isn't a valid reason to restrict access to a public space.

Hypo 2: New Hypoland creates a scholarship program only for students who are veterans. Sam, who is not a veteran, applies and is denied. Result: This might be upheld under the Equal Protection Clause because the government has a valid interest in supporting veterans, who have served the country, making the differential treatment justifiable.

Hypo 3: Bob's city decides to offer free internet service only to neighborhoods with homes valued over $500,000. Sam, living in a neighborhood with lower home values, is excluded. Result: The city's policy could violate the Equal Protection Clause because it seemingly discriminates based on wealth without a sufficient justification for why only high-value homes deserve free internet.
Law School Boost Robot

Get Law School Boost for Free!

Law School Boost makes studying for law school and the Bar easier using our science-backed, A.I.-driven, adaptive flashcards with integrated hypos, plain English legal translations, and memorable illustrations. Start now for FREE!