Logo

When are obscenities and sexually oriented speech considered obscene?

Bar Exam Prep Constitutional Law First Amendment - Free Speech When are obscenities and sexually oriented speech considered obscene?
🇺🇸 Constitutional Law • First Amendment - Free Speech CONLAW#129

Legal Definition

Obscenity and sexually oriented speech are obscene where it describes or depicts sexually content that, taken as a whole by the average person: (1) appeals to the prurient interest using a community standard; (2) is patently offensive to community standards; and (3) lacks serious artistic, literary, political, or scientific value using a national standard.

Plain English Explanation

Obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment. But what counts as obscene? It's not always easy to define. The Supreme Court created a three-part test:

(1) Would the average person, applying contemporary community standards, find that the work appeals to the "prurient interest" (an excessive interest in sexual matters)? What's considered "average" depends on local standards.

(2) Does the work depict sexual conduct in a patently offensive way according to community standards? Again, offensiveness varies by community.

(3) Does the work, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value? Unlike the first two prongs, this is judged by a national standard.

All three prongs must be met for the material to be legally obscene and unprotected by the First Amendment. It's a high bar, and it's hard to prove, especially with the internet connecting diverse communities. But the law recognizes that there's a line somewhere between free speech and obscene content.

Hypothetical

Hypo 1: Bob runs an adult video store in a conservative town in Hypofornia. He starts selling a new pornographic film series that features extremely graphic, violent sexual acts. Sam, a local minister, complains to the police that the videos are obscene. The police obtain the videos and charge Bob with distribution of obscene material. Result: To determine if the videos are obscene, the jury would apply the Miller test: (1) Would the average person in this conservative community find that the highly explicit content appeals primarily to the prurient interest in sex? Given the conservative nature of the town, Prong 1 is likely met. (2) Are the graphic depictions of sexual acts considered patently offensive by the standards of this community? Given the explicitness and the community's conservative values, Prong 2 is met. (3) Do the films lack any serious artistic, literary, political, or scientific value? If the prosecution successfully argues that the films are purely pornographic with no higher value, and Bob cannot provide evidence to the contrary, Prong 3 would be satisfied. Thus, the videos would likely be deemed obscene in this community.

Hypo 2: Bob is an artist who creates sexually provocative paintings that critique gender roles and sexual politics. He displays them in his gallery in a progressive city in Hypofornia. Sam, a conservative activist, is offended by the graphic sexual imagery and sues to have the paintings declared obscene. Result: Applying the Miller test: (1) While the paintings contain graphic sexual content, the average person in this progressive community may view them as more than just an appeal to prurient interests given the political context. Prong 1 is questionable. (2) The explicit imagery might be considered offensive by some in the community, but the prevalent attitudes here make it uncertain. Prong 2 is arguable. (3) Bob has a strong case that his works have serious artistic and political value as pointed social commentary. Prong 3 is likely not met. Since at least one prong fails and the others are uncertain, the paintings are probably not obscene in this jurisdiction.

Hypo 3: Bob operates a website out of Hypofornia that features explicit written stories describing violent sexual encounters. Sam's teenage son in New Hypoland stumbles across the site. Sam is outraged and demands his local authorities take action against Bob for disseminating obscenity. Result: Assuming New Hypoland authorities can even prosecute Bob, they'd apply the Miller test: (1) The extremely explicit sexual content likely appeals to the prurient interest by the standards of most communities, including New Hypoland. Prong 1 is met. (2) The violent nature of the material described would probably be seen as patently offensive. Prong 2 is met. (3) However, as literature, the stories might have some artistic value, even if it's slight. If Bob can make that case, Prong 3 may not be met. With one prong in doubt, and the inherent subjectivity in applying local standards to a website, proving the material is obscene would be an uphill battle.

Hypo 4: Bob is a film studies professor at a university in Hypofornia. In his class on the history of cinema, he screens a mainstream film that contains a brief but explicit unsimulated sex scene. Sam, a student, complains to the administration that showing the film was obscene. Result: The Miller test would likely determine the film is not obscene: (1) The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would likely see the film as not primarily appealing to prurient interests, given its serious subject matter and artistic context. Prong 1 is not met. (2) While the sex scene is explicit, its brief inclusion in a mainstream film would not likely be considered patently offensive by community standards. Prong 2 is not met. (3) As a work of cinema being studied in an academic setting, the film clearly has serious artistic and literary value. Prong 3 is not met. With no prongs satisfied, the film is not obscene in this context.

Related Concepts

Are fighting words protected speech? Are profane and indecent speech protected? Can government speech be challenged? How do you analyze a free speech issue? Is anonymous speech protected? Is discretion allowed in determining fees for public demonstrations? Is speech protected when it incites illegal activity? May the government seize assets of businesses that violate obscenity laws? What are content-based restrictions, and which level of scrutiny is applied? What are designated public forums? What are limited public forums? What are non-public forums? What are prior restraints and when are they valid? What are public forums? What are the limits of free speech during a broadcast? What does the 1st Amendment prohibit, and how is it applied? What is the 1st Amendment right to access private property for speech? What is the constitutionality of laws prohibiting group discrimination? What level of scrutiny is applied to content-based restrictions on public forums? What level of scrutiny is applied to court orders suppressing speech? What level of scrutiny is applied to laws impacting freedom of association? What level of scrutiny is applied to laws that require disclosure of group membership? What rights do the press have in addition to those granted to private citizens? When are time, place, and manner restrictions on speech valid? When is a law unconstitutionally overbroad? When is a law unconstitutionally vague? When is commercial speech protected, and when is it not? When is speech by government employees not protected? When may a private figure recover for defamation if there is no matter of public concern? When may a private figure recover for defamation regarding a matter of public concern? When may a public official or figure recover for defamation? When may the government ban child pornography? When may the government burden lawful, non-misleading, non-fraudulent commercial speech? When may the government punish or limit news reporting? When may the government punish private possession of obscene materials? When may the government regulate symbolic speech? When may the government require a license for speech? When may the government use zoning ordinances to regulate adult businesses? Which level of scrutiny is applied to content-neutral restrictions?
Law School Boost Robot

Get Law School Boost for Free!

Law School Boost makes studying for law school and the Bar easier using our science-backed, A.I.-driven, adaptive flashcards with integrated hypos, plain English legal translations, and memorable illustrations. Start now for FREE!