🤔
Contracts • Third Parties
K#176
Legal Definition
A third party's rights to enforce the contract vest when: (1) they manifests assent to the promise as required; (2) brings a suit to enforce the promise; or (3) materially changes position in justifiable reliance on the promise.
Plain English Explanation
After you determine whether or not there is a third-party beneficiary, the next important question is, "When do their rights activate?" When rights become enforceable, they are said to have "vested." This is important, because once a third-party beneficiary vests, the promisor and promisee are no longer able to modify their agreement.
A third-party beneficiary can vest their rights in one of three ways:
(1) The beneficiary agrees to the terms of the promise in an appropriate way. For example, let's say Bob owes Sam $500. Next, Bob and Amy agree that if Amy pays Sam $500 to cover Bob's debt, Bob will paint Amy's house. Bob sends Sam an email saying, "Hey, just wanted to let you know that Amy has agreed to pay my $500 debt to you." In response, Sam says, "Ok, great!" - Here, Sam's acknowledgment and assent to Bob and Amy's arrangement causes Sam's rights to vest. Sam is now a creditor third-party beneficiary.
(2) The beneficiary brings a lawsuit to enforce the promise.
(3) The beneficiary reasonably relies on the promise. For example, imagine if Bob paid Sam to mow Amy's lawn. Sam agrees. Amy finds out about this arrangement and calls her usual landscaper and says, "Hey guys, I found out someone else is going to cut my lawn for me, so I won't need you for 2 weeks." Amy has relied on Sam's promise to Bob to her detriment and, as such, her rights will vest.
Note that once rights have vested, terms cannot change without consent from the third-party beneficiary.
A third-party beneficiary can vest their rights in one of three ways:
(1) The beneficiary agrees to the terms of the promise in an appropriate way. For example, let's say Bob owes Sam $500. Next, Bob and Amy agree that if Amy pays Sam $500 to cover Bob's debt, Bob will paint Amy's house. Bob sends Sam an email saying, "Hey, just wanted to let you know that Amy has agreed to pay my $500 debt to you." In response, Sam says, "Ok, great!" - Here, Sam's acknowledgment and assent to Bob and Amy's arrangement causes Sam's rights to vest. Sam is now a creditor third-party beneficiary.
(2) The beneficiary brings a lawsuit to enforce the promise.
(3) The beneficiary reasonably relies on the promise. For example, imagine if Bob paid Sam to mow Amy's lawn. Sam agrees. Amy finds out about this arrangement and calls her usual landscaper and says, "Hey guys, I found out someone else is going to cut my lawn for me, so I won't need you for 2 weeks." Amy has relied on Sam's promise to Bob to her detriment and, as such, her rights will vest.
Note that once rights have vested, terms cannot change without consent from the third-party beneficiary.
Visual Aids
Related Concepts
In a third-party beneficiary situation, who is the third-party beneificiary, who is the promisor, and who is the promisee?
What are the implied warranties of an assignor in an assignment for consideration?
What defenses may a promisor assert against a third-party beneficiary?
What duties are not delegable?
What is a delegatee?
What is a delegator, delegatee, and obligee?
What is an assignee?
What is an assignment?
What is an assignor?
What is an obligee?
What is an obligor?
What is a promisee?
What is a promisor?
What is the difference between an assignment and a delegation?
What is the difference between an incidental and intended beneficiary?
What is the effect of a clause prohibiting assignment?
What is the effect of a contract containing no language about assignment rights?
What is the effect of consideration on assignment rights?
What is the effect of invalidation language on assignment?
What two types of intended beneficiaries are there?
When are modification agreements between the obligor and assignor effective?
When can an assignee sue an obligor for payments to the assignor?
When does delegation of duties occur?
Who can sue whom in a suit involving beneficiaries, promisees, and promisors?
Who can sue whom in a suit involving the assignment of rights?
Who can sue whom in a suit involving the delegation of duties?
Who prevails when the same rights have been assigned to multiple parties?