Logo

Who prevails when the same rights have been assigned to multiple parties?

Bar Exam Prep Contracts Third Parties Who prevails when the same rights have been assigned to multiple parties?
🤔 Contracts • Third Parties K#191

Legal Definition

When there are more than one gratuitous assignments, generally the last assignee wins and revokes prior assignments. When there are multiple assignments for consideration, generally the first assignee for consideration wins, except a subsequent assignee may take priority when they: (1) have no notice of the earlier assignment, and (2) are the first to obtain payment, a judgment, a novation, or indicia of ownership.

Plain English Explanation

Sometimes people get a bit carried away when they are assigning rights and it isn't uncommon for the same rights to be assigned to multiple people (especially over time). Ultimately, the law will only allow one party to enforce rights against an obligor, so determining which party has that right depends on circumstance.

If the rights were gifted to multiple people, then the last person to receive them as a gift will be the legal assignee with actual rights to enforce. In other words, if Grandpa one year assigns his rights to the family beach house to his grandson one year, and then assigns them to his granddaughter the next year, the grandson's assignment no longer exists.

If the rights were sold to multiple people, then the first person to buy them wins. A later assignee can prevail if they aren't aware of the first person and they can get some sort of legal evidence of ownership to the rights assigned.

Visual Aids

Who prevails when the same rights have been assigned to multiple parties?
Law School Boost Robot

Get Law School Boost for Free!

Law School Boost makes studying for law school and the Bar easier using our science-backed, A.I.-driven, adaptive flashcards with integrated hypos, plain English legal translations, and memorable illustrations. Start now for FREE!