π
Corporations β’ Formation Requirements
CORP#013
Legal Definition
Persons who treat an entity like a corporation are estopped from later claiming it was not. Corporation by estoppel applies to contracts, not torts.
Plain English Explanation
Where others rely on your claims or representations of incorporation, the law will treat you as if you had actually incorporated. In general, any time you see "estoppel," it usually means a court is saying, "We get that it isn't technically true, but since y'all acted as if it were for so long, we're going to go ahead and pretend, too." Why would they do this? Because it can help avoid an outcome that is unfair or inequitable.
Hypothetical
Hypo 1: BadCorp enters into an agreement to buy 1,000 widgets from WidgetCorp for $10 each. A week later, BadCorp discovers it could have purchased the same widgets from another supplier for $5 each. While trying to figure out what to do, BadCorp discovers that it was improperly incorporated and is not actually a legal entity. This means that BadCorp's shareholders can save thousands of dollars by notifying WidgetCorp that BadCorp doesn't actually exist, and then choosing to create a new corporation that purchases from the cheaper supplier. WidgetCorp sues. Result: BadCorp believed and acted as if it were a legitimate corporation, so the court will not allow it to escape that fiction in order to screw over WidgetCorp and back out of their deal. Thus, BadCorp will be estopped from claiming it is not bound to the contract with WidgetCorp because it doesn't exist.
Hypo 2: PettyCo has been working with NiceCorp for years. One day, an employee of PettyCo stumbles across the fact that NiceCorp was improperly incorporated and not actually a legal entity. Upon hearing this, PettyCo attempts to sue NiceCorp's shareholders and hold them personally liable for a past due bill. Result: Assuming the shareholders were unaware of the defect, PettyCo may be estopped from holding NiceCorp's shareholders liable since it had always previously acted as if it were properly incorporated.
Hypo 2: PettyCo has been working with NiceCorp for years. One day, an employee of PettyCo stumbles across the fact that NiceCorp was improperly incorporated and not actually a legal entity. Upon hearing this, PettyCo attempts to sue NiceCorp's shareholders and hold them personally liable for a past due bill. Result: Assuming the shareholders were unaware of the defect, PettyCo may be estopped from holding NiceCorp's shareholders liable since it had always previously acted as if it were properly incorporated.
Related Concepts
Are bylaws required to form a corporation, and who is allowed to create and modify them?
How broad can a statement of business purpose be?
In what instances will courts pierce the corporate veil?
What are the requirements for articles of incorporation?
What are ultra vires activities and their consequences?
What is a de facto corporation?
What is a de jure corporation and how is it formed?
What is a foreign corporation and how does it gain the ability to operate?
What is "piercing the corporate veil"?
What is the legal significance of corporate formation?
Why are courts more willing to pierce corporate veils for tort victims?