Logo

What are the wiretapping and eavesdropping exceptions to the warrant requirement?

Bar Exam Prep Criminal Procedure Exclusionary Rule What are the wiretapping and eavesdropping exceptions to the warrant requirement?
🫥 Criminal Procedure • Exclusionary Rule CRIMPRO#023

Legal Definition

Generally, wiretapping and eavesdropping require a warrant. However, there are two exceptions: (1) the unreliable ear or uninvited ear (i.e., one assumes the risk that the person they are speaking to either consents to government monitoring or is wearing a wire), and (2) where one makes no attempt to keep a conversation private.

Plain English Explanation

If criminals talk about crimes so loud that someone located in a place they are allowed to be can overhear and eavesdrop on those conversations, then no warrant is required to listen. In other words, cops can't hide outside someone's window and put their ear to the house to listen to what is going on outside, but if they can hear someone talk loudly from the public sidewalk or on the other side of a fence, then listening is fair game.

Additionally, though wiretapping a phone line requires a warrant, wiretapping a person does not (as long as they consent to it). In other words, if police place a wire on an informant, and a criminal chooses to confess crimes to that informant, the police don't need a warrant to listen or record from that wire. This is known as the "unreliable ear," meaning when you talk to someone else you always risk that the person may have agreed to wear a listening device.
Law School Boost Robot

Get Law School Boost for Free!

Law School Boost makes studying for law school and the Bar easier using our science-backed, A.I.-driven, adaptive flashcards with integrated hypos, plain English legal translations, and memorable illustrations. Start now for FREE!