Logo

In California, how can a lawyer limit their malpractice liability with a client?

Bar Exam Prep Prof Responsibility Loyalty In California, how can a lawyer limit their malpractice liability with a client?
‼️ Prof Responsibility • Loyalty PR#036

Legal Definition

They can't. Unlike the ABA rules, California does not allow lawyers to seek out ways to limit their liability in any circumstances. In fact, a lawyer must promptly disclose to the client any facts giving rise to any legal malpractice claim against them.

Plain English Explanation

In California, lawyers can't make deals to avoid responsibility if they make mistakes. If they mess up, they have to own up to it and tell their clients, just like a doctor would need to admit to a mistake during surgery. This rule is there to protect clients, making sure lawyers do their best work and stay accountable. It also helps clients know when something has gone wrong so they can decide what to do next.

Hypothetical

Hypo 1: Bob, a contract lawyer, realizes he made a significant error in drafting Amy's business agreement that could cost her millions. He immediately drafts an agreement offering to waive his fees if Amy agrees not to sue him for malpractice. Result: Bob's actions violate California's rules. He is not allowed to limit his malpractice liability under any circumstances, even by offering to waive his fees. Instead, Bob must promptly disclose to Amy the error he made and the potential malpractice claim it could give rise to.

Hypo 2: Bob includes a clause in his standard retainer agreement stating that Amy agrees to limit any future malpractice claims to the amount of fees she has paid. Amy signs the agreement without question. Result: This clause is unenforceable and violates California's rules. Lawyers cannot limit their malpractice liability in California, whether for past or future actions. Bob could face disciplinary action for attempting to circumvent his professional responsibilities in this manner.

Hypo 3: Bob misses a critical filing deadline in Amy's case. Realizing his mistake, he promptly calls Amy, explains the error, and informs her that this missed deadline could be grounds for a malpractice claim against him. He advises her to seek independent legal counsel to assess her options. Result: Bob has correctly followed California's rules. He promptly disclosed the facts giving rise to a potential malpractice claim and did not attempt to limit his liability. His suggestion that Amy seek independent counsel is appropriate given the circumstances.

Hypo 4: After winning a large settlement for Amy, Bob realizes he may have overlooked a potential additional claim that could have increased the award. He decides not to tell Amy, reasoning that she's happy with the outcome and unaware of the potential additional recovery. Result: Bob is violating California's rules. Even though Amy is satisfied with the result, Bob has a duty to promptly disclose facts that could give rise to a malpractice claim. His failure to inform Amy of the overlooked claim is a breach of this duty.

Visual Aids

In California, how can a lawyer limit their malpractice liability with a client?
In California, how can a lawyer limit their malpractice liability with a client?

Related Concepts

Are lawyers allowed to have sex with their clients? Can an attorney continue to represent a client if a conflict exists? Does representing clients with inconsistent positions violate the lawyer's Duty of Loyalty? How can a lawyer limit their malpractice liability with a client? How can screening avoid imputed conflicts? How do the California rules differ from the ABA when it comes to a lawyer accepting compensation from a party other than their client? In assessing a conflict of interest, what is a concurrent conflict? In assessing the Duty of Loyalty, what's the difference between an actual conflict and a potential conflict? In California, are lawyer's allowed to have sex with their clients? In California, how must a lawyer advise their client to seek independent counsel when dealing with potential financial conflicts? In California, may a lawyer represent an insurance company and its policyholder as joint clients? In California, what are the restrictions related to lawyers acquiring the media rights of their clients? In California, what are the restrictions related to lawyers receiving gifts from their clients? In California, when may a lawyer loan money to a client? What are some common issues that occur when a lawyer represents multiple clients in the same matter? What are the most common types of conflicts of interest that involve a lawyer's own interest? What are the restrictions related to lawyers acquiring the media rights of their clients? What are the restrictions related to lawyers receiving gifts from their clients? What is an imputed conflict and how can it be resolved? What is required in order for a lawyer to accept compensation from a party other than their client? What is required in order for a lawyer to avoid a financial conflict with a client? What is the Duty of Loyalty? When does the general rule of imputed conflicts NOT apply? When may a lawyer appear as a witness in a matter where they represent a party? When may a lawyer loan money to a client? When may there be a conflict of interest with a former client?
Law School Boost Robot

Get Law School Boost for Free!

Law School Boost makes studying for law school and the Bar easier using our science-backed, A.I.-driven, adaptive flashcards with integrated hypos, plain English legal translations, and memorable illustrations. Start now for FREE!